![]() (On non-color devices, they'd simply look dashed.) For text, I could use both coloring and underlining. ![]() The problem with that approach is that it violates my single-source constraint: I don't want to maintain multiple copies of the same figure with different formatting any more than I want to maintain multiple copies of the same text with different formatting.Īnother workaround would be to have a single diagram that uses, say, lines that are both colored and dashed, so they'd be distinguishable on both color and non-color output devices. I could create different versions of the diagram and use conditional content constructs to choose the one I want. In the figure above (there's only one figure, it's just expressed in two different ways), I want to define and apply a "highlight graphic" line style for some arrows and rectangles, using different definitions of this style. The problem is, I don't know of any software that will let me specify named line styles and define them differently for different contexts. If I wanted to express the same highlighting information in a black and white presentation, I could "bold-face" the lines: More problematic, I think, is conditional formatting in figures and diagrams. As far as I know, FrameMaker doesn't, but perhaps there is a way to coax it into exhibiting this behavior. ![]() I don't know whether traditional WYSIWYG word processors support this kind of thing. If I were writing for a device with no color support, I'd probably use black as my standard code color and something like bold as a highlighting technique: ![]() In a recent article, for example, I use blue as my standard code color with red as a highlight color: Because I want to write for multiple output devices, some of which support color and some of which do not, I'd like to be able to specify conditional formatting as I write. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |